Through my observations, I have come to the conclusion that gender/sex stereotypes are still being reinforced through the media. Through sports media, we not only see that females are seen as highly sexualized. In the sports illustrated covers, the only time women were seen was if they were half naked or in the background used as means of a diverse crowd. While sex plays a role, there is an expected gender that follows sex. People don't realize that both men and women can have different genders. When most of the sports illustrated covers show that all the male athletes are muscular, it shows that men need to be masculine. We rarely see skinny feminine men on covers. This just shows how society praises the ideal masculine man. In addition to men being held up to certain standards, women also are. If society deems that women need to look like Kate Upton, it hold women to a standard that they all need to look like models. By sports illustrated normalizing the ideal body of men and women, it reinforces the idea that if men and women don't look a certain way, they are deemed not as ideal.
References:
http://cnnsi.com/vault/cover/select/2013-01-01/2013-12-31/dd/3/index.htm
That is shocking to know that only two out of sixty Sports Illustrated covers have been strictly girls. Even more shocking is that the two have been of Kate Upton only. The exploitation of girls is apparent through sports magazines, but it is interesting that you pointed out the male aspect also. I agree on both ends.
ReplyDeleteAustin Cannell
I was shocked also and there were actually 3 SI covers with women on them. The third included a Boston Policewoman with two other policemen and David Ortiz. It's debatable if that even counts but just thought it should be recognized. -Brandon Fukutome
ReplyDelete